> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://www.coios.me/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# Primary care death records match ONS registrations for 88% of deaths in OpenSAFELY-TPP
- URL: https://www.coios.me/primary-care-death-records-match-ons-registrations-for-88/
- Published: 2026-10-17T09:20:00.000Z
- Updated: 2026-10-17T10:00:01.000Z
- Description: Of 1,409,275 ONS-registered deaths from 2020 to 2025, 88% had the same date of death in primary care and 8% had none.
- Author: Daniel Ryan
- Tags: Data, models and systems, What linked data reveals, Revisions and new sources, United Kingdom, #preprint, #refines, #item, #lead, #source-2026-10, #score-82, #pin

The study assessed completeness and concordance of death recording in primary care records against ONS death registrations. It used records linked in OpenSAFELY-TPP, covering only practices using TPP software, for deaths from 2020 to 2025\. Among 1,409,275 ONS-registered deaths, 88% had an identical primary care date and 8% had none. Of 1,324,995 primary-care-recorded deaths, under 2% lacked an ONS record. Single-source deaths were more common under age 45 and in Mixed, Asian, Black, and Chinese or Other ethnic groups. Primary-care-only deaths increased close to the data extraction date, reaching 7% in February 2026.

*Why it is interesting: Quantifies how far a widely used primary care resource can stand in for national death registration. It also shows where completeness falls short, by age, ethnicity and recency.*

Source

[medRxiv, 15 October 2026](https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.14.26365028?ref=coios.me)

Paper

Accuracy and completeness of death recording in primary care electronic health records compared with national death registrations in England using OpenSAFELY-TPP

Authors

Pesce M, Hulme WJ, Kyomuhangi I, Prestige E, Evans D, Wong SY et al.

DOI

10.64898/2026.10.14.26365028

Type

Preprint

Design

Validation of linked primary care EHR death records against national death registrations, OpenSAFELY-TPP, 1,409,275 ONS-registered deaths, 2020-2025

Verdict

Refines prior evidence

Driver

[What linked data reveals](https://www.coios.me/d-linked-data/)

Driver

[Revisions and new sources](https://www.coios.me/d-data-sources/)

Abstract — the authors' own words, CC BY

Introduction:

Primary care electronic health records (EHRs) are an important resource for health research, but death recording in primary care EHRs may be incomplete or differ from Office for National Statistics (ONS) death registrations. We used OpenSAFELY-TPP to assess the completeness and concordance of death recording and provide recommendations for using date-of-death information. Methods:

Using linked primary care EHRs and ONS death registrations, we assessed whether ONS-registered deaths from 2020-2025 had a primary care date of death and, where present, calculated the difference between dates. Where a primary care date was absent, we assessed death-related SNOMED CT codes. Analyses were conducted overall and by year, population subgroup, and general practice. We also examined GP registration end dates and primary-care-recorded deaths without a corresponding ONS record, including monthly patterns near the data extraction date. Results:

Among 1,409,275 ONS-registered deaths, 88% had the same date recorded in primary care and 8% had no corresponding primary care date. Among 1,324,995 deaths recorded in primary care, Conclusions:

Death recording in primary care EHRs showed high completeness and concordance with ONS registrations, but discrepancies remained for recent deaths and some population groups. Data recency and population-specific completeness should therefore be considered when using linked mortality data for research.