COIOS
COIOS

How societies are paying for and providing care for older people

Every ageing society is renegotiating the same settlement, and the evidence is about which arrangements hold. Japan's mandatory long-term care insurance, running since 2000, has survived by raising premiums and tightening eligibility; Germany's has raised contributions repeatedly; the Netherlands spends more per head than almost anyone and is now trying to shift care home. England has abandoned a lifetime cap on care costs and commissioned another review, due to report in stages to 2028. Across countries the direction is the same: more care at home, more reliance on unpaid carers, and a workforce increasingly recruited from abroad. What the evidence does not yet show is outcomes. Spending and coverage are well measured; the health of people receiving care, and of those providing it unpaid, is not, and evaluations of funding reforms against those outcomes are rare. The unpaid-care literature is the least settled: the health effects on carers are real but their size and direction depend on who is measured.

Status
building
Direction
steady
Would change our view
An evaluation of a national funding reform showing a measurable effect on recipients' or carers' health, or the English review's final report.
Trackers
Gaps
Comparable measurement of unpaid care across countries; outcome data beyond spending and coverage; anything on ageing in place from outside Northern Europe, Japan and North America.