COIOS
Healthcare today Item refines peer-reviewed

CT surveillance after lung cancer surgery left quality of life unchanged

In the French IFCT-0302 trial, 1,775 patients resected for non-small cell lung cancer were randomised to CT-based or minimal follow-up, and time to deterioration in mental (HR 0.97) and physical (HR 1.13) quality of life did not differ between the arms.

IFCT-0302 randomised 1,775 patients after resection for non-small cell lung cancer to surveillance by chest CT or by clinic visits and chest X-ray, with quality of life assessed every six months to two years and annually to five. Time to deterioration did not differ for either dimension (mental HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82-1.15; physical HR 1.13, 0.92-1.38). The parent trial had already found that CT detected more early recurrences and second primaries treatable with intent to cure, without improving survival.

Why it is interesting: It closes the remaining argument on either side of intensive imaging in a cancer where more detection did not translate into longer life.

Source
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 22 September 2026
DOI
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2026.08.031
Type
Peer-reviewed article
Design
Prespecified secondary patient-reported outcome analysis of the IFCT-0302 randomised phase III trial, n=1775, SF-12 to 5 years
Verdict
Refines prior evidence
Driver
Cancer