This systematic review and meta-analysis compared continuing versus stopping oral anticoagulation after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. It pooled 3 randomised trials and 35 cohort studies, covering 280,415 patients followed for 2.7 years. Net clinical benefit (NCB) weighed ischaemic strokes prevented against intracranial haemorrhages caused, counting each haemorrhage as 1.5 strokes. Pooled, continued anticoagulation left ischaemic stroke similar but raised major bleeding (OR 2.93) and intracranial haemorrhage (OR 3.63). NCB favoured stopping (-0.46; 95% CI -0.77 to -0.14), a negative score meaning net harm from continuing. The trials alone showed no difference on any outcome, so the harm signal rests on observational cohorts.
Why it is interesting: Anticoagulation after ablation shapes both stroke and bleeding rates in people with atrial fibrillation. The pooled evidence suggests its stroke benefit shrinks after ablation while its bleeding cost remains.
Cite this item
BibTeX
Free sign-up. A digest of the new papers twice a week, grouped by domain.