COIOSDeep risk insights through multi-disciplinary research across the globe
Misty cityscape with modern skyscrapers at sunrise
Item new Peer-reviewed Added

Fine particulate matter shows no association with ovarian cancer across pooled cohorts

A systematic review of 145 studies of environmental chemical exposures and gynaecologic cancers found no pooled association between PM2.5 and ovarian cancer (HR 1.02 per 5 µg/m³, 95% CI 0.91–1.13) and only a marginal one for endometrial cancer (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.99–1.05).

The review searched epidemiologic studies of environmental chemical exposures and ovarian or endometrial cancer incidence and mortality, finding 145 eligible studies, over half on ovarian cancer only and half conducted in North America. Outdoor air pollution and ultraviolet light were the most studied exposures. A meta-analysis of seven PM2.5 studies gave a pooled hazard ratio of 1.02 (95% CI 0.91–1.13) per 5 µg/m³ for ovarian cancer and 1.02 (95% CI 0.99–1.05) for endometrial cancer.

Why it is interesting: Air pollution is now a routine suspect in cancer aetiology, and for these two cancers the pooled evidence is close to null while endometrial incidence keeps rising unexplained.

Source
Environmental Research, 16 September 2026
Paper
Epidemiologic research on environmental chemical exposures and ovarian and endometrial cancers: a systematic review
Authors
Ammons S, Post LM, Pruitt C, Sisson P, Shields TC, Applebaum KM et al.
DOI
10.1016/j.envres.2026.125661
Type
Peer-reviewed article
Design
Systematic review of 145 epidemiologic studies with meta-analysis of 7 PM2.5 studies
Verdict
New finding
Driver
Cancer
Driver
A changing climate
Free full text
Free to read at the publisher
Abstract — the authors' own words, CC BY

Endometrial cancer (EC) and ovarian cancer (OC) are the most diagnosed gynecologic malignancies in the U.S. Environmental exposures are biologically plausible risk factors but remain understudied, and synthesis of these relationships is lacking. We systematically searched for epidemiologic studies evaluating associations between environmental chemical exposures and EC and/or OC incidence and mortality. Among 145 studies that met inclusion criteria, over half were focused on investigation of OC only (N=78; 54%), were conducted in North America (N=75; 53%), and most used a cohort design (N=58; 40%). Outdoor air pollution (N=27; 18%) and ultraviolet light (N=22; 15%) were the most represented exposures, followed by pesticides (N=16; 11%). We conducted a meta-analysis of seven studies of the most frequently investigated pollutant, fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ), including two studies of OC, three of EC, and two studies evaluating both tumors. There was no evidence of a meta-association for PM 2.5 and OC based on four studies (HR meta per 5 μg/m 3 =1.02, 95%CI=0.91-1.13); this finding was consistent among the three studies that mutually adjusted for co-pollutants (HR meta per 5 μg/m 3 =0.94, 95%CI=0.81-1.09). For EC, the summary estimate from five studies was weakly elevated overall (HR meta =1.02, 95%CI=0.99-1.05) and in analyses limited to studies with co-pollutant adjustment (HR meta =1.01, 95%CI=1.00-1.01) or incident cases only (HR=1.01, 95%CI=1.01-1.02). Our review confirms the sparse literature on environmental risk factors for these cancers and notable heterogeneity in exposures studied. Relatively limited investigation of EC is an important research gap given its unexplained rising incidence in population subgroups within the U.S. and globally.

Other drivers in Health today