COIOSDeep risk insights through multi-disciplinary research across the globe
a bunch of buildings that are next to each other
Item new Preprint · not peer-reviewed Added

Video-and-audio AI system detected stroke deficits more sensitively than EMS raters

Against a consensus of seven neurologists, an AI system reading video and audio of 295 suspected stroke patients detected neurological deficits with 78.5% sensitivity, versus 59.4% for emergency medical services (EMS) personnel, with similar specificity.

Researchers tested APOLLAI, an AI system that detects stroke-related neurological deficits from video and audio recordings. They compared it with emergency medical services (EMS) personnel in 295 patients with suspected stroke at Nimes University Hospital. Seven stroke neurologists scored five National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale items: gaze, facial palsy, arm weakness, aphasia and dysarthria. Their combined scores formed the reference standard, and about 15 EMS raters assessed each patient. Overall, APOLLAI had 78.5% sensitivity versus 59.4% for EMS, specificity of 87.0% versus 85.9%, and AUC 0.882. Neurologist agreement was only moderate (mean kappa 0.541), and all assessments used recordings at one centre.

Why it is interesting: Nearly one-third of strokes go unrecognised before hospital arrival. On the same recordings, the AI system flagged more deficits than EMS raters while keeping specificity.

Source
medRxiv, 22 October 2026
Paper
APOLLAI, a multimodal AI system, versus EMS personnel for prehospital detection of stroke-related deficits
Authors
Javault C, Vargas Gonzalez E, Pibre L, Yriarte F, Thouvenot E
DOI
10.64898/2026.10.16.26365784
Type
Preprint
Design
Prospective single-centre diagnostic accuracy study, 295 suspected-stroke patients, Nîmes University Hospital, Aug 2023–Jul 2025; model vs EMS raters against Dawid-Skene consensus of seven neurologists
Verdict
New finding
Driver
AI in medicine
Driver
Health systems and access

Other drivers in Data, models and systems