COIOS
cars on road between high rise buildings during daytime
Item new Preprint · not peer-reviewed Added

Modelled pandemic costs rise far more from under-control than from over-control

In transmission models fitted to first-year COVID-19 cases in 110 countries, cost-optimal average transmission reduction ranged from 31.2% to 57.3%, and a shortfall of five percentage points was associated with excess costs above 400%, against 10-80% for the same margin above the optimum.

Mechanistic transmission models were fitted to the first year of reported COVID-19 cases in 110 countries and combined with GDP-scaled intervention costs and infection costs covering quarantine and mortality, to find the transmission reduction that minimised total cost over 26, 40 and 52 weeks. Cost-optimal average transmission reduction ranged from 31.2% to 57.3%, with a mean excess-cost ratio of 55.2% (median 30.8%). Excess costs were asymmetric around the optimum, exceeding 400% for five percentage points below it against 10-80% for the same margin above it, under the modelled assumptions and in a preprint that is not yet peer reviewed.

Why it is interesting: It puts a cost shape, rather than a single target, on early pandemic intervention intensity, and tests how far national indices such as SDI and GDP per capita track country-specific optima.

Source
medRxiv, 5 October 2026
DOI
10.64898/2026.10.02.26363193
Type
Preprint
Design
Mechanistic transmission models fitted to first-year COVID-19 cases in 110 countries, with multi-objective cost optimisation over 26-, 40- and 52-week horizons
Verdict
New finding
Driver
Infection and pandemics
Driver
Health funding and inequalities
Driver
Value in health