COIOSDeep risk insights through multi-disciplinary research across the globe
a lone tree on the side of the road
Item contradicts Peer-reviewed Added

Reanalysed mammography trials are compatible with breast cancer overdiagnosis below 5%

A reanalysis of randomised mammography trials, benchmarked against Denmark's Funen screening programme, found the extra cancers detected compatible with breast cancer overdiagnosis below 5%, against published estimates up to 50%.

Published estimates of breast cancer overdiagnosis from randomised mammography trials range from near zero to about 50%, depending on how exit screening is handled. The authors reanalysed the trials in a single framework, measuring the extra cancers in screened groups against the pattern seen in Denmark's Funen screening programme. At 52 points in follow-up the extra cancers closely tracked that pattern, which the authors read as compatible with overdiagnosis below 5%.

Why it is interesting: Overdiagnosis is the contested quantity in breast screening policy, and published estimates have spanned near zero to 50%.

Source
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 14 September 2026
Paper
Breast cancer overdiagnosis in mammography trials-separating signal from noise: a meta-analysis
Authors
Njor SH, Pedersen CU, Lynge E, Smith RA, Rebolj M
DOI
10.1093/jnci/djag302
Type
Peer-reviewed article
Design
Unified reference-based reanalysis and meta-analysis of randomised mammography screening trials, 73 observed relative proportions across 52 follow-up timepoints, benchmarked against the Funen, Denmark service-screening programme
Verdict
Contradicts prior evidence
Driver
Cancer
Driver
Revisions and new sources

Other drivers in Health today