COIOSDeep risk insights through multi-disciplinary research across the globe
brown brick building with white framed glass window
Item new Peer-reviewed Added

Self-reported debt in UK survey data compared with credit reference agency records

Self-reported debt in a UK panel survey disagreed with credit reference records for some types, altering links with mental health.

Using Wave 4 of the UK Household Longitudinal Study, it compared self-reported debt with Credit Reference Agency (CRA) records. Consenters to CRA linkage were more likely than refusers to be older, partnered, employed, homeowners and UK-born. Across eight debt types, misclassification was lowest for overdrafts, personal loans and retail finance. Prevalence gaps were largest for credit cards and other running debts. In Bayesian hierarchical models, the source used changed estimated associations between debt and mental health. The data came from a single survey wave, and the linked sample was selective because consenters differed from refusers.

Why it is interesting: Linking survey answers to credit records showed, debt type by debt type, where self-reports and records disagree. The estimated link between debt and mental health depended on which record was used.

Source
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 4 November 2026
Paper
How reliable are self-reports of debt? Misclassification, selection, and measurement bias between survey and administrative data in the UK Household Longitudinal Study
Authors
Kibuchi E, Kopasker D, Stokes J, Leyland AH, Katikireddi SV
DOI
10.1093/jrsssa/qnag123
Type
Peer-reviewed article
Design
Validation study comparing self-reported and Credit Reference Agency debt across 8 debt types in Wave 4 of the UK Household Longitudinal Study, three samples (full, nonconsenters, linked consenters), Bayesian hierarchical models for mental health associations
Verdict
New finding
Driver
What linked data reveals
Abstract — the authors' own words, CC BY

Abstract

Self-reported and administratively recorded debt measures are susceptible to measurement error, while selection bias may arise if individuals who consent to data linkage differ systematically from those who do not. This study evaluates the quality of self-reported and administrative debt measures by assessing selection into linkage, agreement between data sources, and the implications of measurement differences for associations with mental health. Using Wave 4 of the UK Household Longitudinal Study linked to Credit Reference Agency (CRA) records, we compared 8 debt types across 3 analytical samples: the full analytical sample, nonconsenters sample, and linked consenters sample. Agreement between self-reported and CRA-recorded debt was assessed using misclassification, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Mental health associations were estimated using Bayesian hierarchical regression models. Respondents who consented to linkage were more likely to be older, partnered, employed, homeowners, and UK-born. Misclassification varied across debt types and was lowest for overdrafts, personal loans, and retail finance. Substantial discrepancies were observed between self-reported and CRA-recorded debt prevalence, particularly for credit cards and other running debts. Differences between data sources also influenced estimated debt-mental health associations. These findings underscore the need to account for selection and measurement error in linked debt data.

Other drivers in Data, models and systems