This systematic review asked whether intervention-induced changes in DNA-methylation clocks match clinical outcome changes in human geroscience studies. Twenty-six studies were included: 13 comparative and 13 single-arm pre-post designs. Fifteen were mixed, six indeterminate and four jointly inconclusive; one uncontrolled study was uniformly concordant for intermediate outcomes. No comparative study or study of patient-important outcomes was uniformly concordant, and none validated a clock as a surrogate endpoint. Eleven studies assessed individual-level associations, responder differences or mediation, but clear findings were isolated and not replicated. No combination of intervention, clock and outcome allowed meta-analysis, and certainty of evidence was very low throughout.
Why it is interesting: The review tests whether epigenetic clocks can stand in for clinical outcomes in ageing intervention studies. Favourable signals were mainly in selected intermediate outcomes, and clocks remain exploratory rather than validated surrogates.
Cite this item
BibTeX
Free sign-up. A digest of the new papers twice a week, grouped by domain.